I used GMass for a while.
It did the job.
Easy to set up. Integrated with Gmail. Sent emails without drama.
But as I started ramping up—more contacts, more follow-ups, more volume—stuff started breaking.
Deliverability dropped. Gmail limits got annoying.
I couldn’t set up domains the way I wanted.
And I realized… this tool just wasn’t built for the kind of cold outreach I needed to run.
That’s when I started testing.
Five tools. Real campaigns. No free plans or sandbox tests. Just live emails and actual metrics.
I tracked everything—setup time, reply rates, ease of scaling, inbox health.
And what do I find? Let’s just say… There are better GMass alternatives if you’re serious about cold outreach.
If you want to stop wondering whether your emails are even landing, this breakdown will save you time, cash, and your sender reputation.
I ran campaigns with five GMass alternatives.
Some crushed it. Some didn’t.
Here’s the short version:
I’ve read dozens of GMass reviews. Most users like it. I did too.
But if you look closely, there’s a pattern—especially once you start sending at scale.
Here’s what stood out:
Everyone loves how GMass works inside Gmail. It’s easy to set up, has no learning curve, and plugs straight into your inbox.
But that also means: you’re stuck inside Gmail’s limits.
Most folks praised deliverability at first. But a few hinted at issues once their campaigns grew.
Inbox Rotation [Email Rotation]: How it helps in Email Deliverability
If you’re sending high volumes, you need to control your DNS, warmup pace, and sending domains. GMass doesn’t give you that level of backend access.
If your workflow is one inbox, one user, GMass is perfect.
But teams? Agencies? Bigger ops? That’s where friction shows up.
GMass is solid, especially if you’re running lean, inside Gmail, and sending light.
But when I started ramping up, it became clear: it’s not built for scale, infrastructure, or full control.
That’s why I went looking for GMass alternatives.
This wasn’t some fake demo or test inside a sandbox.
I ran actual cold email campaigns — the same way most of us do in real life.
Here’s how I set it up:
I picked a B2B SaaS list.
All leads were decision-makers — same ICP across the board.
Each tool got the same data, the same number of contacts, and the same message.
This wasn’t just a one-day test.
I ran campaigns for 4 full weeks.
Every tool was used live — nothing was run in isolation.
Here’s what I measured across all tools:
That’s how I know what actually works—and what doesn’t.
Let’s keep it simple:
If GMass helps you send emails...
Mailforge helps make sure they land.
This isn’t just another “cold email tool.”
Mailforge is the email infrastructure behind cold outreach — and yeah, that matters a lot if you’re sending serious volume.
Mailforge is where you set up all the back-end stuff you usually don’t think about —like domains, mailboxes, DNS, SPF, DKIM, all that techy deliverability stuff...
Except here, it takes 5 minutes.
I used it to spin up 5 domains + 5 mailboxes in under 10 minutes.
Everything was automated. Zero headaches. No manual steps.
Here’s what I liked:
“Used Google Workspace before. Switched to Mailforge. Better results, instantly.”
– Isabella L.
“What took hours before now takes minutes.”
– Karlo Binda
Mailforge doesn’t send the emails.
You still need to plug it into a tool like Salesforge, Instantly, or Smartlead.
But if you don’t fix your email setup first,
Nothing else you plug in is going to work anyway.
Way cheaper than using Gmail or Outlook if you're doing this at scale.
If you’re sending 20 emails a week, GMass is fine.
But if you’re doing real cold outreach — and want inbox delivery that works at scale — Mailforge is the cold email setup you need.
This is the kind of tool you build on.
If you already have leads and want to send a lot of cold emails—fast—Smartlead does exactly that.
No built-in lead finder. No domain setup.
But when it comes to high-volume outreach with automation, it delivers.
Here’s how it's up in My Testing
You don’t need 5 tabs open just to send and follow up.
If you’ve already got the data, Smartlead makes scaling easy.
And if you don’t?
Leadsforge is a good match to pair with Smartlead — it helps you build lead lists fast, no scraping scripts needed.
You’ll want to use it with other tools if you're doing full-stack outreach.
All tiers include warmup + unlimited sending inboxes.
Smartlead is a real GMass alternative when your goal is to send more cold emails with less hands-on work.
It won’t find your leads or set up your domains — but it will get your messages out fast, keep replies organized, and help you automate your follow-up game.
If you’ve got your list ready (or using something like Leadsforge), Smartlead is ready to fire.
If your only goal is to get in front of as many leads as possible — and fast, Instantly makes it simple.
You don’t get deep personalization or fancy workflows.
But if all you care about is sending cold emails at scale, it does the job.
It’s a “plug-and-play” tool that doesn’t ask for much setup.
✅ Instantly vs GMass
Basically, if you’ve got a list (or use their database), Instantly gets you sending fast.
Instantly is all about volume and speed, not finesse or complex setups.
It’s a “send big, send often” kind of platform — not great for surgical campaigns.
All plans include warmup and database access — solid value if you send at scale.
Instantly is a reliable GMass alternative when you’re focused on speed, scale, and simplicity.
It’s not trying to be your CRM, enrichment tool, or workflow builder.
It’s just here to send more emails, get more replies, and do it with as little friction as possible.
Want clean UI, fast setup, and emails that actually land?
Instantly does exactly that.
Instantly.ai vs. Salesforge
If your cold emails feel like they’re getting ignored, Lemlist helps you stand out — not with volume, but with personality.
You’re not just sending plain text.
You’re sending GIFs, images, even videos — stuff people might actually respond to.
Not the fastest to master, but powerful once you do.
You’re not just sending — you’re building mini-campaigns that look and feel different.
If you’re doing high-touch sales or recruiting, Lemlist helps you show up better in the inbox and on LinkedIn.
So yeah, not great for cold email beginners.
You get a 14-day free trial to play around before committing.
Lemlist isn’t built for brute-force sending.
It’s for standing out.
If you want more replies from fewer emails, and you’re willing to invest time into personalization — Lemlist is a great GMass alternative to try.
But if you just want to load a CSV and hit send?
This probably isn’t the one for you.
If cold email is just one part of how you do outreach, Reply.io gives you the rest.
Email. LinkedIn. SMS. Even voice.
It ties everything into one dashboard, so you don’t have to juggle 4 tools and 12 tabs.
If you’re new to multichannel tools, there’s a learning curve. But once you figure it out, it’s powerful.
It’s less of a sender, more of a complete engagement system.
If your sales process spans multiple channels, Reply.io simplifies the chaos.
So yeah — powerful, but not beginner-friendly.
Reply.io starts at $59/month if you just want cold emails with basic warm-up.
If you want to add LinkedIn steps, SMS, and multiple inboxes, that jumps to around $99/month per user.
Agencies who manage lots of clients will want the $160+ plan, which unlocks higher volume, dashboards, and extra features.
And if you want the AI writing tools or LinkedIn automation, those are paid add-ons.
So yeah—you’ll pay more than GMass. But you also get a lot more control.
Reply.io is for people doing serious outbound — and doing it across multiple channels.
It’s not for beginners.
It’s not for people who just want to “send a few cold emails.”
But if your team needs visibility, analytics, and one system to run it all — it’s a solid GMass alternative to check out.
Here’s how I’d break it down:
After weeks of testing, here’s what actually matters:
So yeah, tools like Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist, and Reply.io all bring something to the table.
But if you’re building a serious outbound engine, you need a strong foundation—not just another sender.
Before you obsess over copy, open rates, or tools—fix your email infrastructure.
📬 I used Mailforge to spin up domains, automate DNS, and keep inboxes clean.
It’s simple, fast, and works with any sender.
👉 Try Mailforge Free — it’s the setup I wish I had when I started scaling cold email.
Because great outreach starts before you hit send.
Yes, but most free tools come with limits (send caps, no support, missing features).
If you're just testing, Smartlead or Instantly offer free trials. For serious outreach, paid tools are more reliable.
GMass is faster to start, but Lemlist gives you multichannel flows and personalized visuals.
If you're doing creative outreach or running multi-step campaigns, Lemlist wins. For simple Gmail blasts, GMass is fine.
Yes — but Mailforge isn’t a sender. It sets up your domains, mailboxes, and DNS properly, then connects to tools like Salesforge, Instantly, or Smartlead.
You’ll still use Gmail or another tool to send, but now with better deliverability.
The cleanest setup looks like this:
Mailforge for domain + inbox infrastructure
Leadsforge for lead sourcing
Smartlead, Salesforge, or Instantly for sending
That combo gives you control, deliverability, and speed at scale.
Use warmed-up domains. Rotate inboxes. Avoid spammy words.
Set up proper DNS (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). Or just use a tool like Mailforge — it handles all of that for you automatically.