Table of contents
Get insights delivered straight into your inbox every week!

We Tested 5 GMass Alternatives and Competitors For Sales Outreach

I used GMass for a while.

It did the job. 

Easy to set up. Integrated with Gmail. Sent emails without drama.

But as I started ramping up—more contacts, more follow-ups, more volume—stuff started breaking.

Deliverability dropped. Gmail limits got annoying.

I couldn’t set up domains the way I wanted.

And I realized… this tool just wasn’t built for the kind of cold outreach I needed to run.

That’s when I started testing.

Five tools. Real campaigns. No free plans or sandbox tests. Just live emails and actual metrics.

I tracked everything—setup time, reply rates, ease of scaling, inbox health.

And what do I find? Let’s just say… There are better GMass alternatives if you’re serious about cold outreach.

If you want to stop wondering whether your emails are even landing, this breakdown will save you time, cash, and your sender reputation.

TL;DR — What I’d Use If I Were You

I ran campaigns with five GMass alternatives.

Some crushed it. Some didn’t.

Here’s the short version:

  • Mailforge gives you the cold email infrastructure—domains, DNS, warm-up—so your emails actually land when you start scaling.
  • GMass is still solid for basic Gmail users. But once you try to scale, it shows cracks.

  • Smartlead works great if you’re bootstrapping and need quick warmups + inbox rotation.

  • Instantly is smooth, easy to use, and ideal for fast campaign launches.

  • Lemlist gives you creative control—visual steps, LinkedIn flows—better for hybrid outreach.

  • Reply.io is best for CRM-heavy teams that want structure + tracking.

Why People Start Looking Beyond GMass?

I’ve read dozens of GMass reviews. Most users like it. I did too.

But if you look closely, there’s a pattern—especially once you start sending at scale.

Here’s what stood out:

❌ 1. Gmail is the Strength… and the Limit

Everyone loves how GMass works inside Gmail. It’s easy to set up, has no learning curve, and plugs straight into your inbox.

But that also means: you’re stuck inside Gmail’s limits.

GMass reviews on G2
This image shows the GMass reviews on G2

⚠️ 2. Deliverability Gets Tricky

Most folks praised deliverability at first. But a few hinted at issues once their campaigns grew.

GMass reviews on G2
This image shows the GMass reviews on G2
Inbox Rotation [Email Rotation]: How it helps in Email Deliverability

🧱 3. There’s No Real Infrastructure Control

If you’re sending high volumes, you need to control your DNS, warmup pace, and sending domains. GMass doesn’t give you that level of backend access.

GMass reviews on G2
This image shows the GMass reviews on G2

🧵 4. It’s Great for Simple Sends, Not Scaling Teams

If your workflow is one inbox, one user, GMass is perfect.

But teams? Agencies? Bigger ops? That’s where friction shows up.

GMass reviews on G2
This image shows the GMass reviews on G2

GMass is solid, especially if you’re running lean, inside Gmail, and sending light.

But when I started ramping up, it became clear: it’s not built for scale, infrastructure, or full control.

That’s why I went looking for GMass alternatives. 

How I Tested These Tools (So You Know It’s Real)

This wasn’t some fake demo or test inside a sandbox.

I ran actual cold email campaigns — the same way most of us do in real life.

Here’s how I set it up:

✅ I Used the Same List, Same Leads, Same Industry

I picked a B2B SaaS list.

All leads were decision-makers — same ICP across the board.

Each tool got the same data, the same number of contacts, and the same message.

📬 I Sent Real Campaigns Over 4 Weeks

This wasn’t just a one-day test.

I ran campaigns for 4 full weeks.

Every tool was used live — nothing was run in isolation. 

📊 I Tracked 4 Things That Actually Matter

Here’s what I measured across all tools:

  1. Deliverability — Did the emails land in inboxes or spam?

  2. Reply Rate — How many people actually responded?

  3. Ease of Setup — How long did it take to get running?

  4. Support — If things broke, how fast could I fix it?

That’s how I know what actually works—and what doesn’t.

🔄 Side-by-Side: GMass vs These 5 Alternatives

🔧 Feature / Tool GMass Mailforge Smartlead Instantly Lemlist Reply.io
Deliverability ⚠️ ☑️
Inbox Rotation ☑️
DNS Control
Visual Builder
CRM Sync ☑️
Lead Database
Warm-Up Included ☑️
Multichannel
AI Writing
Setup Time ✅ Fast ✅ Fast ✅ Fast ✅ Fast ⚠️ Medium ⚠️ Medium
Pricing Starts At ~$12/mo ~$13/mailbox + $70/yr (5 domains) $39/mo $37/mo $55/mo $59/mo
Best For Basic Scaling Budget Testing Creative CRM Teams

🧩 Top 5 GMass Alternatives

  • Mailforge
  • Smartlead
  • Instantly
  • Lemlist
  • Reply.io 

🔧 Mailforge — The Cold Email Setup GMass Can’t Give You

Let’s keep it simple:

If GMass helps you send emails...

Mailforge helps make sure they land.

This isn’t just another “cold email tool.”

Mailforge is the email infrastructure behind cold outreach — and yeah, that matters a lot if you’re sending serious volume.

🧩 What Is Mailforge?

Mailforge Homepage
This image shows the Mailforge Homepage

Mailforge is where you set up all the back-end stuff you usually don’t think about —like domains, mailboxes, DNS, SPF, DKIM, all that techy deliverability stuff...

Except here, it takes 5 minutes.

I used it to spin up 5 domains + 5 mailboxes in under 10 minutes.

Everything was automated. Zero headaches. No manual steps.

🚀 Why It’s One of the Best GMass Alternatives?

Here’s what I liked:

  • It automatically sets up your email domains the right way

  • Emails landed in inboxes, not spam

  • Support was insanely fast (I’m talking Slack replies in under 5 minutes)

  • It’s built for scaling cold outreach, not casual use

“Used Google Workspace before. Switched to Mailforge. Better results, instantly.”

– Isabella L.

“What took hours before now takes minutes.”

– Karlo Binda

✅ GMass vs Mailforge

Feature GMass Mailforge
What it is Gmail-based email sending tool Cold email infrastructure setup tool
Setup Time Fast (works inside Gmail) Fast (5–10 mins with full DNS automation)
Sending Emails Yes, from Gmail No (used with tools like Salesforge/Smartlead)
Inbox Deliverability Good at small scale, drops with volume Built for high deliverability at scale
Domain & DNS Setup Manual or not available Fully automated (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, etc.)
Best For Small senders using Gmail Teams scaling cold outreach seriously
Support Email-based, decent Super fast (Slack/chat, usually within mins)
Pricing ~$10–20/month (basic plans) ~$70/year (domains) + ~$13/mailbox/month
Gmail Dependency 100% Gmail-based Not tied to Gmail — works with any sender
Spam Protection Limited control Domain warmup + masking options available

✅ Best For:

  • Founders who want to scale cold email

  • Sales teams are tired of Gmail limits

  • Agencies that need control over the setup

  • Anyone getting flagged or landing in spam

What does Mailforge not do?

Mailforge doesn’t send the emails.

You still need to plug it into a tool like Salesforge, Instantly, or Smartlead.

But if you don’t fix your email setup first,

Nothing else you plug in is going to work anyway.

💰 Mailforge Pricing

Mailforge Pricing
This image shows the Mailforge Pricing
  • ~$70/year for 5 domains

  • ~$13/month per mailbox (or $15 if billed monthly)

  • SSL + domain masking = optional add-on ($2/mo per domain)

Way cheaper than using Gmail or Outlook if you're doing this at scale.

If you’re sending 20 emails a week, GMass is fine.

But if you’re doing real cold outreach — and want inbox delivery that works at scale — Mailforge is the cold email setup you need.

This is the kind of tool you build on.

Smartlead.ai — A GMass Alternative That’s Built for Sending at Scale

Smartlead.ai Homepage
This image shows the Smartlead.ai homepage

If you already have leads and want to send a lot of cold emails—fast—Smartlead does exactly that.

No built-in lead finder. No domain setup.

But when it comes to high-volume outreach with automation, it delivers.

AI interactions in Smartlead.ai
This image shows the AI interactions in Smartlead.ai

Here’s how it's up in My Testing

  • Deliverability: Solid with warmup turned on

  • Reply Rate: Decent — auto-filters help you stay on top

  • Ease of Setup: Took about 10 minutes; interface isn’t fancy

  • Support: Not instant, but it gets the job done
Smartlead.ai G2 reviews
This image shows the Smartlead.ai G2 reviews

✅ What Smartlead Does Best

  • Unlimited mailboxes — no per-user pricing headaches

  • Built-in warmup for all your inboxes

  • Works across email, SMS, WhatsApp, and Twitter

  • Smart follow-ups fire off based on reply behavior

  • Unified inbox to manage replies in one clean view

You don’t need 5 tabs open just to send and follow up.

✅ Smartlead vs GMass

Feature GMass Smartlead.ai
What it is Gmail-based sending tool Cold email platform with multi-channel support
Email Sending Volume Limited by Gmail account Sends 6,000–300,000+ emails/month
Mailbox Support 1 Gmail account Unlimited mailboxes
Inbox Management Uses your Gmail inbox Unified inbox for all replies
Follow-Up Automation Yes Yes – customizable and based on replies
Deliverability Support Basic warmup (manual) Built-in warmup for all inboxes
Multi-Channel Outreach Email only Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Twitter
Lead Generation Not included Not included
Infrastructure Setup Relies on Gmail settings Needs external setup (use with Mailforge)
Best For Small Gmail users Agencies & SDRs with lead lists
Pricing ~$10–20/month (basic) Starts at $39/month

🧠 Best For

  • Solo founders or SDRs with lead lists

  • Agencies juggling multiple clients

  • Teams that want to send power without manual work

If you’ve already got the data, Smartlead makes scaling easy.

And if you don’t?

Leadsforge is a good match to pair with Smartlead — it helps you build lead lists fast, no scraping scripts needed.

⚠️ What Could Be Better in Smartlead.ai?

  • No lead generation or enrichment built in

  • UI feels a little laggy at times

  • Support isn’t 24/7 (but they try)

You’ll want to use it with other tools if you're doing full-stack outreach.

💰 Smartlead Pricing

Smartlead Pricing
This image shows the Smartlead Pricing
  • Basic – $39/month (6K emails)

  • Pro – $94/month (150K emails)
  • Custom Plan - $174/month onwards

All tiers include warmup + unlimited sending inboxes.

Smartlead is a real GMass alternative when your goal is to send more cold emails with less hands-on work.

It won’t find your leads or set up your domains — but it will get your messages out fast, keep replies organized, and help you automate your follow-up game.

If you’ve got your list ready (or using something like Leadsforge), Smartlead is ready to fire.

Instantly.ai — A GMass Alternative Built for Volume

Instantly.ai Homepage
This image shows the Instantly.ai Homepage

If your only goal is to get in front of as many leads as possible — and fast, Instantly makes it simple.

You don’t get deep personalization or fancy workflows.

But if all you care about is sending cold emails at scale, it does the job.

⚙️ How It Performed in My Test?

Instantly.ai G2 reviews
This image shows the Instantly.ai G2 reviews
  • Deliverability: Solid with warmup turned on

  • Reply Rate: Decent, depends on your copy

  • Ease of Setup: Very fast — up and running in under 10 mins

  • Support: Responsive and helpful for most use cases

It’s a “plug-and-play” tool that doesn’t ask for much setup.

✅ What Instantly Does Well?

  • Built-in B2B contact database (huge time-saver)

  • Unlimited warmup across inboxes

  • AI CRM organizes all replies in one view

  • Easy-to-build follow-up sequences

  • Great for running multi-mailbox campaigns at scale

Instantly vs GMass

Feature GMass Instantly.ai
What it is Gmail-based sending tool Cold email platform with built-in lead database
Email Sending Volume Limited by a Gmail account Sends up to 500,000+ emails/month
Mailbox Support 1 Gmail account Unlimited mailboxes
Inbox Management Uses your Gmail inbox Unified inbox to manage replies
Follow-Up Automation Yes Yes – multi-step sequences
Deliverability Support Basic warmup (manual) Built-in warmup across all inboxes
Multi-Channel Outreach Email only Email only
Lead Generation Not included Built-in B2B contact database
Infrastructure Setup Relies on Gmail settings No setup needed – ready out of the box
Best For Basic Gmail outreach Small teams or agencies focused on volume
Pricing ~$10–20/month (basic plan) Starts at $37/month

Basically, if you’ve got a list (or use their database), Instantly gets you sending fast.

🎯 Who is It Best For?

  • Solo founders or SDRs who want quick sending power

  • Agencies managing outreach for clients

  • Small teams that don’t want to stitch tools together

Instantly is all about volume and speed, not finesse or complex setups.

⚠️ What You Might Not Love about Instantly.ai?

  • Targeting filters are basic — expect to clean up leads manually

  • No deep personalization options

  • It might feel heavy if you only send a few hundred emails/month

It’s a “send big, send often” kind of platform — not great for surgical campaigns.

💰 Instantly.ai Pricing

Instantly.ai pricing
This image shows the Instantly.ai pricing
  • Growth – $37/month (1K contacts / 5K emails)

  • Hypergrowth – $97/month (25K contacts / 100K emails)

  • Light Speed – $358/month (100K contacts / 500K emails)

  • Enterprise – Custom (for high-volume pros)

All plans include warmup and database access — solid value if you send at scale.

Instantly is a reliable GMass alternative when you’re focused on speed, scale, and simplicity.

It’s not trying to be your CRM, enrichment tool, or workflow builder.

It’s just here to send more emails, get more replies, and do it with as little friction as possible.

Want clean UI, fast setup, and emails that actually land?

Instantly does exactly that.

Instantly.ai vs. Salesforge

Lemlist — A GMass Alternative That Feels Human, Not Spammy

Lemlist Homepage
This image shows the Lemlist Homepage

If your cold emails feel like they’re getting ignored, Lemlist helps you stand out — not with volume, but with personality.

You’re not just sending plain text.

You’re sending GIFs, images, even videos — stuff people might actually respond to.

How Lemlist Performed in My Testing?

Lemlist user review on G2
This image shows the Lemlist user review on G2
  • Deliverability: Good with warmup on, but images can hurt inbox placement if overused

  • Reply Rate: Higher for creative campaigns

  • Ease of Setup: Easy for email-only; multichannel takes time to learn

  • Support: Not the fastest, and refund policy isn’t flexible

Not the fastest to master, but powerful once you do.

✅ What Lemlist Does Best

Lemlist Dashboard
This image shows the Lemlist Dashboard
  • Add personalized images, videos, and GIFs

  • Run multichannel sequences — email, LinkedIn, even calls

  • Built-in warmup for inbox protection

  • Templates for fast campaign launches

  • Lead database and verification built in

You’re not just sending — you’re building mini-campaigns that look and feel different.

🎯 Who It’s Best For

  • Agencies doing personalized outreach at scale

  • SDRs who want more than just “Hey {{first_name}}”

  • Teams that already know what multichannel outreach is

If you’re doing high-touch sales or recruiting, Lemlist helps you show up better in the inbox and on LinkedIn.

✅ Lemlist vs GMass

Feature Lemlist GMass
Primary Use Case Personalized, creative outreach Simple cold email campaigns via Gmail
Email Warm-Up ✅ Built-in warm-up ✅ Inbox rotation available
Multichannel Outreach ✅ Email, LinkedIn, Calls ❌ Email only
Email Personalization ✅ Add videos, images, dynamic content ⚠️ Basic merge tags only
Automation Sequences ✅ Full sequences across channels ✅ Follow-ups via Gmail
Lead Database Included ✅ Yes (with basic verification) ❌ Needs Google Sheet or external source
Ease of Setup ⚠️ Moderate (learning curve for multichannel) ✅ Super easy (Gmail plugin)
Deliverability ✅ Good with warm-up, depends on media usage ⚠️ Depends on Gmail limits and setup
Support ⚠️ Slower, strict refund policy ✅ Fast, responsive email support
Best For Teams focused on personalization and omnichannel flows Founders, freelancers, or teams already using Gmail
Starting Price $55/month ~$10/month (Standard Plan)

⚠️ What’s Not Ideal

  • No AI to help write copy — you’re on your own

  • Some users reported fake opens or buggy tracking

  • Bit of a learning curve for multichannel flows

  • Support can feel rigid — especially on refunds

So yeah, not great for cold email beginners.

💰 Lemlist Pricing

Lemlist Pricing
This image shows the Lemlist Pricing
  • Email Pro – $69/month (3 emails, warmup, A/B testing)

  • Multichannel Expert – $99/month (adds LinkedIn + calls)

  • Enterprise – Custom pricing

You get a 14-day free trial to play around before committing.

Lemlist isn’t built for brute-force sending.

It’s for standing out.

If you want more replies from fewer emails, and you’re willing to invest time into personalization — Lemlist is a great GMass alternative to try.

But if you just want to load a CSV and hit send?

This probably isn’t the one for you.

Reply.io — Best GMass Alternative If You Want Full Multichannel Control

Reply.io Homepage
This image shows the Reply.io Homepage

If cold email is just one part of how you do outreach, Reply.io gives you the rest.

Email. LinkedIn. SMS. Even voice.

It ties everything into one dashboard, so you don’t have to juggle 4 tools and 12 tabs.

⚙️ How It Performed in My Test

Reply.io G2 reviews
This image shows the Reply.io G2 reviews
  • Deliverability: Solid (with warm-up), but LinkedIn needs careful pacing

  • Reply Rate: Higher for multichannel flows

  • Ease of Setup: Takes time — not plug-and-play

  • Support: Decent, but slow during peak hours

If you’re new to multichannel tools, there’s a learning curve. But once you figure it out, it’s powerful.

✅ What Reply.io Does Well

  • Combine email + LinkedIn + SMS + voice into one flow

  • Auto-follow-ups based on open/click/reply

  • Syncs with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive

  • Built-in A/B testing and analytics

  • AI tools for writing cold emails (as add-ons)

It’s less of a sender, more of a complete engagement system.

GMass vs Reply.io

Feature GMass Reply.io
Best For Simple Gmail-based cold email Full multichannel sales outreach
Channels Email only Email, LinkedIn, SMS, Voice
Follow-ups Automated (basic) Automated with custom rules
Built-in CRM No Yes (with reply tracking + analytics)
Warm-Up Yes Yes (included)
AI Support No Yes (add-on for email writing)
Setup Time Fast (plug-and-play) Medium (learning curve)
Integrations Google Sheets Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, more
Pricing Starts At $12/month $59/month
Scalability Limited by Gmail Built for outbound teams & agencies

🎯 Who It’s Best For

  • SDR teams running high-volume outbound

  • Agencies juggling multiple clients

  • Teams using Sales Navigator who want email/SMS to follow up

  • Sales leads who want analytics on what’s actually working

If your sales process spans multiple channels, Reply.io simplifies the chaos.

⚠️ Where It Falls Short

  • The UI feels cluttered, especially for new users

  • LinkedIn automation can be risky if not throttled right

  • Support isn’t lightning-fast

  • Some users report bugs in scheduling and sync

So yeah — powerful, but not beginner-friendly.

💰 Reply.io Pricing

Reply.io starts at $59/month if you just want cold emails with basic warm-up.

If you want to add LinkedIn steps, SMS, and multiple inboxes, that jumps to around $99/month per user.

Agencies who manage lots of clients will want the $160+ plan, which unlocks higher volume, dashboards, and extra features.

And if you want the AI writing tools or LinkedIn automation, those are paid add-ons.

So yeah—you’ll pay more than GMass. But you also get a lot more control.

Reply.io is for people doing serious outbound — and doing it across multiple channels.

It’s not for beginners.

It’s not for people who just want to “send a few cold emails.”

But if your team needs visibility, analytics, and one system to run it all — it’s a solid GMass alternative to check out.

How to Choose the Right Tool (Without Wasting Weeks Testing)

Here’s how I’d break it down:

  • If you're scaling fast and tired of deliverability issues →

    You need real infrastructure. Not another Gmail band-aid.

    (Go with something like Mailforge)

  • If you’re just getting started and want something quick that works →

    Smartlead or Instantly are solid out of the box.

    Easy setup. Gets the job done.

  • If you want to stand out in the inbox and send fun, visual stuff →

    Lemlist lets you add images, gifs, LinkedIn steps, even calls.

    Feels more personal, less “cold.”

  • If your team runs big outbound plays and you live in Salesforce or HubSpot →

    Reply.io gives you full control over workflows and data.

    It’s a sales machine—just needs time to learn.

  • Still stuck in Gmail?

    Look, GMass works. But only to a point.

    Once you need scale, tracking, and real control… you’ll outgrow it.

Final Verdict: What Worked Best (and Why)

After weeks of testing, here’s what actually matters:

  • Deliverability beats everything. If your emails don’t land, nothing else matters.

  • Scale needs setup. Gmail tools are great starters—but they don’t scale without cracks.

  • Multichannel isn’t optional anymore. Email alone is fine, but serious teams need more touchpoints.

  • Speed matters. You want tools that help you move faster, not slow you down with technical blockers.

  • Support makes a difference. When something breaks mid-campaign, fast help is underrated.

So yeah, tools like Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist, and Reply.io all bring something to the table.

But if you’re building a serious outbound engine, you need a strong foundation—not just another sender.

💡 Pro Tip:

Before you obsess over copy, open rates, or tools—fix your email infrastructure.

📬 I used Mailforge to spin up domains, automate DNS, and keep inboxes clean.

It’s simple, fast, and works with any sender.

👉 Try Mailforge Free — it’s the setup I wish I had when I started scaling cold email.

Because great outreach starts before you hit send.

❓ FAQs About GMass Alternatives

1. Is there a free alternative to GMass?

Yes, but most free tools come with limits (send caps, no support, missing features).

If you're just testing, Smartlead or Instantly offer free trials. For serious outreach, paid tools are more reliable.

2. Which is better for cold outreach: GMass or Lemlist?

GMass is faster to start, but Lemlist gives you multichannel flows and personalized visuals.

If you're doing creative outreach or running multi-step campaigns, Lemlist wins. For simple Gmail blasts, GMass is fine.

3. Can I use Mailforge with Gmail?

Yes — but Mailforge isn’t a sender. It sets up your domains, mailboxes, and DNS properly, then connects to tools like Salesforge, Instantly, or Smartlead.

You’ll still use Gmail or another tool to send, but now with better deliverability.

4. What’s the best setup for scaling cold email?

The cleanest setup looks like this:

Mailforge for domain + inbox infrastructure

Leadsforge for lead sourcing

Smartlead, Salesforge, or Instantly for sending

That combo gives you control, deliverability, and speed at scale.

5. How do I avoid landing in spam?

Use warmed-up domains. Rotate inboxes. Avoid spammy words.

Set up proper DNS (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). Or just use a tool like Mailforge — it handles all of that for you automatically.